To my friends, family and GSV Partners,
As many of you know, from 2013-2015, I was a proud Board member and steward of the Chicago Public Schools (“CPS”). It was one of the greatest honors and privileges of my life to serve CPS given my passion for providing ALL children equal access to a great education and my deep love of Chicago.
As many of you also know, for the last three and one-half years, I have been part of an ongoing, albeit intermittent investigation by the Chicago Public Schools Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”) into possible conflicts of interest with my education technology investments. Articles in the Chicago Sun-Times that used partial information spawned the investigation. The OIG’s March report, discussed below, inadvertently confirmed the Sun-Times intentional omission. The OIG subsequently hired members of the Chicago Sun-Times team.
For more than twenty years, my goals have been to identify and support companies that deliver high-impact educational results and promote equity and access for all students. Over these years, I have garnered extensive knowledge and experience as an investor and advisor within the education technology sector. I was asked to join the CPS board due to that experience, coupled with my longstanding professional and philanthropic commitment to build school environments where ALL students can best learn and thrive.
My desire to serve on the CPS Board was anchored in our collective mission: to make sure that CPS students have the education and supports that they need and richly deserve. I freely dedicated my time to the CPS Board and continued to provide very substantial philanthropic support to CPS students and CPS school programs during my two-year tenure. Throughout my tenure, I adhered to the highest standards of integrity and professionalism, and I never sought personal financial gain.
The OIG submitted his confidential report on my investigation to the Chicago Board of Education in March 2018. My counsel was notified at the time by Chicago Public Schools that the report found no violation of law and no action was being taken related to me. Unable to fully publish the report, the OIG recently leaked the full report to the Chicago Sun-Times, to the same reporter who wrote the prior stories. She reached out to me last week notifying me that she had the full leaked report. Aware of the leak, I then received the report from Chicago Public Schools two days later. It is deeply concerning to me that a public official serving Chicago’s students and tasked with investigating ethical and legal issues can do so while flagrantly exhibiting his own ethical breach.
In the report, the OIG did in fact determine that I did not violate any laws and that no action will be taken. However, the OIG report casts aspersions on my character via a series of unseemly tactics, and I cannot leave those unaddressed. As a prime example, despite the OIG stating very clearly and repeatedly that I had nothing whatsoever to do with abusive and criminal behavior of the former Chicago Public Schools Superintendent, the OIG attempts to manufacture a linkage by combining my report with hers. I do apologize for the length of this memo but I felt it important to call out specific details, like that one, from the report to illustrate specific fallacies. The important points are below, and the record reflects the following:
1) I fully and completely disclosed each of my education investments before, during and after my Chicago Public Schools Board tenure. I also proactively implemented a quarterly update with the CPS General Counsel that was not required.
While the report concedes that I was transparent in my full disclosure of my investment holdings, it suggests technical errors in paperwork. I worked closely with the CPS General Counsel and additionally hired outside counsel twice to ensure full disclosures. I have been an executive in a highly regulated industry for over 30 years. I understand the gravity of compliance and never once have had any issue. My investment holdings have always been on my public website as well.
2) In my 20+ year role as an education technology expert, I did and do appropriately advocate for proven high performing educational products that drive better outcomes for students. I referred to the importance of educational efficacy repeatedly in my school discussions and correspondence with principals during my Board tenure. And as a Chicago Public School Board member who took her role very seriously, I visited over 50 schools meeting with inspiring principals across the City in order to develop better perspectives on a host of issues. In every instance I conducted myself in full observance of the CPS Board’s Code of Ethics.
The report suggests that I may have violated Board ethics rules in meeting with and corresponding with school principals about efficacious education products. At no time did I ever engage in a discussion about product procurement. In fact, the report failed to quote an email exchange where a Principal tried to enlist my help with the District in procuring a specific product. I immediately told the Principal that I could not do that, and asked to be removed from the email and reported the exchange to the CPS General Counsel. Additionally, the report attempts to twist my usage of the term “bias.” Yes, I always identify my “bias.” If I have an interest in a company, I want people to know that upfront. That is representative of my commitment to strong compliance and complete transparency.
I would also note the report’s attempt to insinuate conflicts where none exist. One of my cited visits was to Gwendolyn Brooks College Prep. The Principal had been using products from two companies I was invested in with extraordinary success well before I ever met him. In fact, then Principal and now Superintendent Janice Jackson had recommended one of the products to the Principal of Brooks because of the academic success she had experienced with her students. When I met the Brooks Principal, Brooks had just had the highest improvement in ACT scores in the District thanks in part to these highly efficacious products. Obviously, I had nothing to do with the products’ procurement as they were obtained well before the Principal met me; so highlighting this in the report is nonsensical and frankly outrageous.
3) I completely recused myself from a Board vote on the one contract (ThinkThroughMath) that came to the Board for a vote and in which I had an investment interest. I in no way violated that recusal and to suggest otherwise is factually incorrect.
While the report repeatedly states that I in no way influenced the ThinkThroughMath RFP, the OIG tries to suggest that I somehow partially broke my ThinkThroughMath recusal during a dinner at my home. First, as was acknowledged in the report, I neither initiated nor participated in any inappropriate communication with the ThinkThroughMath CEO or the Superintendent about the RFP during the RFP quiet period. As for my recusal from the vote, it was complete and inviolate. On the day I submitted my recusal to the Board office I had a longstanding dinner engagement at my home with the Superintendent, my husband and our teenage son. The Superintendent had completed the RFP and was not a member of the Board. I had recused myself from the Board vote that day. That evening, we acknowledged that the RFP win by ThinkThroughMath was now public to the Board. The Superintendent made a favorable comment about ThinkThroughMath, which I related to the ThinkThroughMath CEO. Suggesting that I violated my recusal is contrary to how I conducted myself and to the facts.
I joined the CPS Board because I felt like I could make a difference given my longstanding commitments to education innovation and to equity and access for all students in the Chicago Public Schools and in the country. My motives were clear – to serve and to make an impact. I am thankful that the OIG investigation has come to a close, and we can return the focus to our students and to the great strides that CPS is making to serve our students effectively. CPS stands as a shining example of what diverse, committed leadership can do to transform and revitalize a large school system. I look forward to continuing to support CPS and our extraordinary students across Chicago.
I remain deeply grateful for having had the privilege to serve.
Sincerely,
Deborah Quazzo